Its proportions and features are amenable to human sense. It is easier for Milton to convince us of the otherness of hell and heaven than to demonstrate the singularity of the garden, for the garden necessarily involves a human perspective. The inalienable otherness of the garden, its existence outside the known human world, is so critical and difficult to convey because, unlike Hell or Heaven, it is nonetheless a human dwelling-place. The garden may well be regarded as the most strenuous achievement of Paradise Lost. A closer look at its positioning in the narrative is instructive, and a proper view of its place requires us to look back, however briefly, at the description of the garden. As such the catalogue serves a functional end rather than purely a descriptive one. Milton's point here is to emphasize the singularity of Eden, and to set it apart from history, myth and legend. Earlier in the poem, Satan seems perfectly confident in his rebellion and evil plans. Curtius notes that this rhetorical device was used to suggest the beauty of landscape. As Book IV opens, Milton presents Satan as a character deeply affected by envy and despair. The catalogue may be seen as a special form of what Ernst Curtius described as the topos of outdoing, in which ‘on the basis of a comparison with famous examples provided by tradition, the superiority, even the uniqueness, of the person or thing to be praised is established’. Alastair Fowler cites a comparable passage from Spenser ( The Faerie Queene, II.xii.52). The catalogue of gardens that comes after the description of Paradise in Book 4 (ll.268–85) of Paradise Lost has been viewed as something of a rhetorical topos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |